The article I chose for this post, is not starkly against my argument that sex and advertising has come to an extremely dangerous boiling point, but it does promote the use of our own sex fueled brains to sell products. The article I chose is actually a chapter out of the book Taking ADvantage You and Me, Babe: Sex and Advertising by Richard F. Taflinger. The chapter describes in detail the deep importance of using sexual imagery in advertising. That it is one of the easiest ways to capture the human eye in a split second. Because after all advertising is all about the speed in which you draw the potential customer in. The author makes it clear that bringing the sexual aspect of the brain into advertising is a trick old as time and one that is certainly here to stay.
Though this chapter was not specifically promoting violence against women in advertising, I feel it’s quite a slippery slope. Once you begin to depict women as sexual objects, you are dehumanizing them. In turn this engrains in men, and women alike that women are ‘less than.’ The chapter on sex and advertising explains the different ways to appeal to men and women sexually. It even reiterates that men need dynamic movement, obvious sexuality, to push boundaries. Where as women prefer subtle images, often with the man portrayed as their ‘saviors.’ I find this concept disturbing, without realizing it, men are being shown images of women who are hyper sexualized, and open for male domination. Where as women are becoming more and more infatuated with the image of six pack clad adonis’s swooping in to save them. It seems we have take two steps foreword to be knocked three steps back.
In my paper I argue strongly that violent images in advertising are an extremely disturbing problem. It is dishearteningly to see that there are entire chapters, in countless books about advertising promoting sexualizing women. I know that cutting out sex in advertising completely would be impossible. Having said that though I thoroughly hope there will be more restrictions put on companies, forcing limitations on how raunchy ads can be in the future.
It really is amazing what extent our public relations generation has taken advertising. It sure has taken a drastic turn from the classics. I can only imagine what our grandparents, or their parents say or would say about these images. It's a wild time that causes our retailers to use drastic measures to sell their products while the actual advertisements hardly how the product and more of the sex around said product.
ReplyDeleteI was really shocked in class when you showed us your blog to back up your point after the paper.I really had no idea that it was that bad and have never really seen such just down right disgusting portrayal of women and sexuality. It really is a shame that advirtisers are taking sex and women two things that are good and special and dragging them through the dirt to make a buck.It's just like, what's next?
ReplyDeleteSarah,
ReplyDeleteI found your paper really interesting and I thought you had a consistent voice throughout your paper. It is really wild when you look into these topics and you are shocked at how much goes on behind the scenes that we don't know about. I have seen some very controversial Tom Ford ads which is basically soft porn. This opened my eyes to how manipulative the whole system is. I guess this is the perfect example of the term "sex sells."
-Alli
I completely agree with your point, but I don't really see the first two images as being violent. The fist image is just..... weird. And beyond kinky, she really looks to like that dog.. And the second looks like the police are searching that woman a little over-eagerly, but I would definitely not classify them being detained for whatever crime they committed a violent act.
ReplyDeleteThe third and fourth images are just plain unacceptable, if you could print a few images like this into your paper I think it would definitely drive your point home!